A number of technical difficulties need to be overcome when shooting up close. Primary among these is light, or lack thereof to be more precise. For a start, often the subject matter that interests macro photographers can only be found under bushes or other shadowy recesses or. I’m referring of course to insects here. If there is an abundance of daylight over the subject, then they are likely to be extremely active and photographing them takes on new dimensions of perseverance and patience. Then comes the issue of the lens that is used. Because of the extremely close-focusing that is required for macro lenses to reproduce the scene at a ratio of 1:1 (the subject is reproduced on the focal plane at exactly the same size as it is in life – there is no magnification or reduction in size to the original) only a sliver of the subject will fall within the depth of field of the lens at any given aperture (see box). Moreover the choice of focal length at such great magnification has a negligible impact on the depth of field, so opting for a wider angle macro shot will only affect the background and working distance, not the depth of field. To be able to get anything near the actual width of an insect (a praying mantis for instance) requires extremely small apertures. This in turn necessitates the use of auxiliary lighting.
The problem with using flash is that it is not a particularly attractive or natural looking lighting source when used on its own. Although, to be fair, flash lighting, even when modified, isn’t exactly ‘natural’. The other option is to increase the ISO in order to obtain higher shutter speeds. However, this increases digital noise in the photograph. As good as modern day cameras are at shooting in the near dark thanks to increasingly higher ISO abilities, if you are shooting professionally you will often need the highest image quality (IQ) possible. That means you will be shooting in the lower ISO regions, once more pushing the shutter speed down. |
|